User talk:Pharaoh Hound

Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
Start a new talk topic.

---

Welcome to the Commons, Pharaoh Hound!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

QI promotions

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catoptrophorus-semipalmatus-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perisoreus-canadensis-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Picoides-villosus-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Archilochus-alexandri-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus-delawarensis-017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Alvesgaspar 17:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

QI promotions

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucephala-albeola-010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas-strepera-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Alvesgaspar 22:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposal: Picture of the Year and Picture of the Month contests

I have posted a new proposal on Commons talk:Featured picture candidates regarding the creation of FP-related contests and would like your feedback on the idea. This message is being sent to some of the regular contributors to Commons:Featured picture candidates. Alvesgaspar 15:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

QI promotions

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Certhia-americana-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coragyps-atratus-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus-glaucoides-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamias-rufus-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulip - floriade canberra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Alvesgaspar 10:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Border Collie

Hey, there. I just noticed the addition of the border collie image to the article. I agree with the caption on the BC page, but I think the line on the image itself may be worth rewording: "She is rather small (not at all difficult to pick up and carry), as is typical of working-type BCs"

Many of the herding dogs - while athletic and lithe (especially compared to conformation dogs) - are definitely not easy to pick up. We've got males, for example, in the 55 pound range. Hmm... perhaps it just depends on who's doing the 'picking'? 32.97.182.177 19:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

QI promotions

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Labrador Retriever snow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas-americana-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Alvesgaspar 23:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Nominating FP for QI

Two of the pictures you have just nominated for QI already have the FP status. Doesn't make much sense, does it? :-) - Alvesgaspar 00:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

QI closing process

I've been taking care of the closing process at Commons:Quality images candidates for a while. But I already have a similar task at Commons:Featured picture candidates and I don't have the time to do both. Since you are so active now in QI, do you want to take over? - Alvesgaspar 00:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello! I would be happy to help, I'm not sure if I'm quite ready (or sure enough of what I'm doing) to take on all the work, but that could change. I do have a question about closing: the QIC page says on the subject of closing that images should be promoted two days after review, and that unassessed images should stay up for 15 days at max. Does this mean that (for example) all the images on the 7th should be removed and dealt with appropriately while all the images on the 6th should stay up until the 21st? (perhaps a bit of a foolish question, but I don't want to mess things up). Also, my apologies for nominating those FPs, I simply wasn't paying enough attention. --Pharaoh Hound 14:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Because I'm not sure of having understood your question, I'll give you an example. Suppose a picture is nominated today, the 10th January. If, by the 25th January, it hasn't generated any "promote" or "decline" review then it will be archived without promotion and the Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to its file. If, during this same period, the image is object of a "promote" or "decline" review (for example, on the 1st February), then there will be a grace period of 48 hours during which that decision can be contested. If there is a contestation the image will be moved to the Consensual review (see the local rules there); if not, the decision will be executed. After the grace period has expired (on the 3rd February), the status of the image (promoted or not promoted) cannot be altered, even if the nomination stays in the page for some time (that depends on the attention and "working rithm" of the closer). Good work! - Alvesgaspar 14:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Catoptrophorus-semipalmatus-001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Catoptrophorus-semipalmatus-001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 08:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotions

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebra Botswana edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elephant Kruger 2003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 17:16, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image promotions

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebra 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Pharaoh Hound 13:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartpolski67u7uuu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chart perski ucho 098i.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pies faraona e34.parka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Jnpet 05:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leonberger głowa40tt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 12:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006 Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February. Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 22:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image promotions

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cocker spaniel angielski zlotyy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 02:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Young mixed-breed dog (aka).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 10:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agelaius-phoeniceus-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--17:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

QI

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horseracing Churchill Downs edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

If you ask me, then put it to the FP candidates... --AngMoKio 12:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavo cristatus ag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thai ridgeback t444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colisa lalia - side (aka).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lampornis-castaneoventris-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Horseracing Churchill Downs.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Horseracing Churchill Downs.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 08:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coccothraustes-vespertinus-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siberian Husky heterchromia edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Bubo bubo portrait.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bubo bubo portrait.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 06:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Flickr uploader

It's weird, but it sometimes randomly kicks out users, saying that they have exceeded their limits. Until now I have not yet found the problem unfortunately. If this happens, what you can do is just try again immediately. If that doesn't work, you can follow the link again after one hour. You do not need to follow all steps again. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clyde The Bulldog.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Coleus_hybrids_Wizard.jpg

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 13:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kea filtered.jpg

Hi there! Any chance you would reconsider your opposing vote on the QI voting of Image:Kea filtered.jpg as the problem with chromatic aberration shouldn't be as bad as it was? Thanks! –Dilaudid 18:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi

Thanks for adding categories to my uploaded image. No idea how you did it but it's much appreciated. :) Erwinloh 13:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Proposal regarding Commons Photographers categories

Hi, You are currently using a Commons Photographer user template on your user page. It has been proposed to redefine the templates and a vote is currently on-going. If interested, I encourage you to participate in the voting process. -- Slaunger 13:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: photo of Beta with Red spots on tail

Hi there, I came across your photo of the beta with the red spots on it's tail and would like to know if you have any information on this type of Beta? You mentioned that you have not seen a beta like it however I have one and have never seen one like it. In fact after searching the web you have the only photo that comes close in comparison, blue eyes and all. Thanks for your time.

My fish was purchased from the "Aqua Creations" fish store in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. I don't know who bred it, but it was most likely a Canadian breeder. You reminded me that there were several other Bettas with similar colouration there when I bought my fish (probably from the same spawning), but I haven't seen any in that store since. According to some sites about Betta genetics it seems we most likely have fish that "blonde", Cambodian, and "marbled" all at once. "Blonde" refers to a lack of black pigmentation (known as "dilute" in cats and dogs), a recessive trait. Marbled would create the spots on the fins, but most marbles also have spots on the body. I can't find anything closer than that, sorry. --Pharaoh Hound 00:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Flickr upload bot

Hmmm... The toolserver is having some problems lately and I can't access it currently... I'll take a look once it is accessible again. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, now works. No idea what went wrong. Probably has to do with downtime earlier. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

ILLYRIAN SHEEPDOG

yo wdf u r doin the pictures that i posted r in the wrong gallery, and its not ur right to rename them u only should remove than and not change their name, the pictures was for the illyrian sheephdog there are no sarplaninacs in those pictures go check the out in molosserdogs.com dogs profile albanian shar mountain dog - DELTARI ILIR aka ILLYRIAN SHEEPDOG ull see the pictures in illyrians sheepdog aka deltari ilir gallery that deltari ilir owners posted so remove those pictures from sarplanianc gallery and change their names to illyrian sheepdog they r not sarplaninac the illyrian and sarplaninac are different from each other so plese remove all my pictures that i postet signed dobermannp

THE SHEPPARD

---

i was just wondering if i could get your permission to draw the shepperd?!? and if you want when i'm done. then i can put it on here. so that you can see it!

it is just an option, i want to do something for my school talent show, and i want to do a dog! :) you don't have to say yes.. it is just something that i can do for my school.

bye

hey man i got an akita chow mix named otto thats the same color as this dog..is this dog still living??

Flickr image

This deleted flickr image you uploaded has been restored. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

• 

hello

hello my name is cheyenne. i was wondering if you would be okay with me useing some of your photos in a high school project. i love the phography. please email me when you get a chance id love to be able to use them. Chawk1232@msn.com have a great day.

        :D

This dog

I want to get a bullmastiff but when i research online i see the bigger, fatter bullmasiff, can you please tell me what this dog it

File source is not properly indicated: File:Greyhound portrait.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Greyhound portrait.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Greyhound portrait.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

matanya • talk 00:29, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Terrier Mixed Breed

A photo from 2007 you posted of a mixed Terrier breed has a doppleganger! My pup is only 2 but I saw your photo and literally could have mistaken it for my dog.

File:Miniature Australian Shepherd blue merle.jpg

File:Miniature Australian Shepherd blue merle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ab237010 (talk) 04:09, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Miniature Australian Shepherd red tricolour.jpg

File:Miniature Australian Shepherd red tricolour.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ab237010 (talk) 04:10, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Border Collie jump.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Border Collie jump.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Bernese Mountain Dogs trio.jpg

File:Bernese Mountain Dogs trio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntonioK ^talk 12:32, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

THIS IMAGE DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU!!!! this image belongs to my husband who owned this dog before her death. this is a pheasant hunt by her and him together. again, THIS IMAGE DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU!!!!! i will seek further action! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.244.134.168 (talk) 15:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Stealing photos as your own

The photo of the boxer puppy is not your photograph as you claim. That picture was taken on July 6 2014 by our daughter of our new puppy. This was taken in Olathe Ks. Do not claim photos as yours when you did NOT take them. How distasteful and disrespectful to those that did take the pictures. Shame on you 2600:387:B:7:0:0:0:81 01:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)